BitcoinWorld Binance October Crash: Founder Changpeng Zhao Blasts ‘Absurd’ Allegations in Explosive Rebuttal In a firm rebuttal to mounting speculation, Binance founder Changpeng Zhao has categorically denied that the global cryptocurrency exchange precipitated last October’s severe market downturn, labeling the accusations as fundamentally “absurd.” Speaking from an undisclosed location, Zhao addressed reports sourced from Walter Bloomberg, emphatically stating that Binance bears no responsibility for the cascading $19 billion liquidation event that rattled digital asset markets worldwide. This defense arrives amid intense regulatory scrutiny and follows the exchange’s completion of a $600 million user compensation program for unrelated technical issues. Deconstructing the Binance October Crash Allegations Changpeng Zhao, commonly known as CZ, directly confronted the narrative linking Binance’s operations to the October market collapse. Consequently, he provided a detailed timeline of events. The crash, which occurred between October 10 and 12, saw Bitcoin’s price plummet by over 15% in a 48-hour window. Moreover, total market capitalization evaporated by approximately $300 billion. Zhao argued that attributing this systemic event to a single entity ignores the complex, interconnected nature of global crypto markets. He highlighted several concurrent factors, including macroeconomic pressures and leveraged positions across numerous platforms. Specifically, Zhao referenced data from blockchain analytics firms. These reports showed liquidations were distributed across all major exchanges, not concentrated on Binance. For instance, CoinGlass data indicated that Binance accounted for roughly 35% of the total liquidations, a share consistent with its overall market dominance in spot and derivatives trading. Therefore, he framed the exchange’s activity as a reflection of broader market sentiment, not a catalyst. “Markets move on global news, macroeconomic fears, and collective trader behavior,” Zhao stated. “To pinpoint one player is a misunderstanding of how decentralized finance truly operates.” The $19 Billion Liquidation Event Explained The scale of the October liquidation event was unprecedented for the year. To clarify, a liquidation occurs when an exchange automatically closes a trader’s leveraged position due to a partial or total loss of the trader’s initial margin. This happens when the trader cannot meet the margin requirements for the leveraged position. In October, a rapid price drop triggered a cascade of these forced sales. Trigger Point: A sharper-than-expected U.S. inflation report sparked a sell-off in traditional markets, which quickly spilled into crypto. Leverage Unwind: High leverage ratios, some exceeding 20x on various platforms, amplified the downward move. Cross-Platform Impact: Liquidations on one exchange put selling pressure on assets, affecting prices on all connected markets. Zhao emphasized that Binance’s risk management systems functioned as designed during the volatility. The exchange’s insurance fund, he noted, covered any deficits to ensure no losses were socialized among other users. This detail is a key part of his argument for the platform’s stability and proper operation during the crisis. Regulatory Oversight and the $600 Million Compensation Separate from the crash allegations, Zhao addressed the completed $600 million compensation program. This initiative resolved issues from a technical incident several months prior that affected a subset of users’ stop-loss orders. Zhao stressed this compensation was proactive, voluntary, and now fully concluded. He connected this action to Binance’s broader commitment to user protection. Furthermore, he pointed to the exchange’s regulatory standing as evidence of its operational integrity. “We are a regulated entity in Abu Dhabi and maintain ongoing, constructive dialogues with authorities globally, including in the United States,” Zhao remarked. This statement directly counters narratives of the exchange operating in a regulatory vacuum. Analysts view this regulatory engagement as a critical step toward mainstream institutional adoption of cryptocurrencies. It demonstrates a shift from the industry’s earlier, more libertarian roots toward compliance with international financial standards. The Evolving Landscape of Crypto Exchange Accountability The debate over the October crash touches on a larger, ongoing conversation about accountability and transparency in cryptocurrency markets. Unlike traditional finance, the crypto ecosystem lacks a central clearinghouse or a unified regulatory framework to definitively assign cause during a market crisis. This ambiguity often leads to speculation and blame directed at the largest market participants. Factor Traditional Finance Cryptocurrency Markets (Pre-Crash) Price Discovery Centralized across major exchanges & dark pools Fragmented across hundreds of global platforms Leverage Oversight Strict, centralized limits (e.g., Reg T) Varies by platform, often self-regulated Circuit Breakers Coordinated market-wide halts Isolated to individual exchanges Blame Attribution Often directed at central banks or data releases Often directed at large exchanges like Binance Experts in market microstructure note that while large exchanges influence liquidity, they are rarely the sole cause of a macro-scale crash. Dr. Lena K. Chen, a fintech researcher, observes, “The October event was a perfect storm of external macro shocks and internal, cross-exchange leverage. Isolating Binance is analytically convenient but likely inaccurate. The data suggests a synchronous, global deleveraging event.” This expert perspective lends credence to Zhao’s defense, framing the crash as a systemic issue rather than an exchange-specific failure. Conclusion Changpeng Zhao’s forceful rejection of the claims surrounding the Binance October crash underscores the complex realities of modern cryptocurrency markets. While the exchange played a significant role in the market due to its size, the evidence points to a confluence of global factors—not a single point of failure—driving the $19 billion liquidation. Zhao’s simultaneous highlighting of completed user compensation and active regulatory engagement aims to rebuild and maintain trust. Ultimately, this episode highlights the growing pains of an asset class transitioning into a more mature, scrutinized, and systemically important component of global finance. The path forward demands clearer data, better cross-exchange coordination, and continued dialogue between innovators and regulators to mitigate the impact of future volatility. FAQs Q1: What exactly was Changpeng Zhao denying? Changpeng Zhao denied allegations that Binance, the cryptocurrency exchange he founded, was responsible for causing or significantly exacerbating the major market crash that occurred in October. He called these claims “absurd” and stated Binance bore no responsibility for the $19 billion in liquidations. Q2: What was the $600 million compensation Zhao mentioned? This was a separate, completed initiative where Binance compensated users affected by a technical glitch related to stop-loss orders that occurred months before the October crash. Zhao emphasized this issue was fully resolved and unrelated to the market downturn. Q3: How does Binance’s regulatory status support its defense? Zhao noted that Binance is a regulated entity in Abu Dhabi and is under the supervision of U.S. authorities. This framing is used to counter perceptions of the exchange operating without oversight, suggesting its operations are subject to external scrutiny and compliance standards. Q4: If not Binance, what caused the October cryptocurrency crash? Market analysts point to a combination of factors: a strong U.S. inflation report that sparked risk-off sentiment across all markets, excessively high leverage used by traders on multiple platforms, and the resulting cascade of automated liquidations that fed into a downward spiral across the globally connected crypto ecosystem. Q5: What are liquidations, and why were they so high in October? Liquidations occur when an exchange automatically closes a trader’s leveraged position because the value of their collateral has fallen too low to maintain the loan. They were exceptionally high in October because many traders were using high leverage (borrowed money) to amplify their bets. A rapid price drop triggered margin calls and forced sales en masse, creating a selling avalanche. This post Binance October Crash: Founder Changpeng Zhao Blasts ‘Absurd’ Allegations in Explosive Rebuttal first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
